↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features of recurrent Kawasaki disease and its risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Clinical features of recurrent Kawasaki disease and its risk factors
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2101-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hai-ming Yang, Zhong-Dong Du, Pei-pei Fu

Abstract

The clinical features and risk factors for recurrence of Kawasaki disease (KD) remain unclear. In order to summarize clinical features of recurrent KD and identify risk factors associated with recurrence, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of consecutive cases of KD from January 2002 to December 2010. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data were analyzed. The maximum coronary artery Z score normalized against body surface area was assessed using coronary artery diameters. At the first onset of recurrent KD, children had longer durations of fever before intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment and higher levels of alanine aminotransferase, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and lower hemoglobin levels than those with a single episode of KD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that long durations of fever before IVIG treatment, high AST levels, and reduced hemoglobin levels were significantly associated with recurrent KD. Ten of the 22 recurrent KD children had coronary artery complications during the first onset episode, and six (60 %) of these also had coronary artery complications during the recurrence. Children with longer durations of fever, lower hemoglobin levels, and higher AST levels may be at increased risk for KD and coronary artery complications are more likely to occur in children with recurrent KD if they were present during the first episode.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3,097
of 3,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,358
of 197,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.