| Title |
A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-013-0325-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yubei Huang, Xiaoliang Zhang, Weiqin Li, Fengju Song, Hongji Dai, Jing Wang, Ying Gao, Xueou Liu, Chuan Chen, Ye Yan, Yaogang Wang, Kexin Chen |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the association between induced abortion (IA) and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 18% |
| Ecuador | 12 | 7% |
| Chile | 10 | 6% |
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Ireland | 6 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Poland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 76 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 158 | 93% |
| Scientists | 8 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#208,358
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#14
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,771
of 317,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.