↓ Skip to main content

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Eyelid: Management and Prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Eyelid: Management and Prognosis
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, February 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.6077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen M. Herbert, Michelle T. Sun, Dinesh Selva, Bertie Fernando, George M. Saleh, Michele Beaconsfield, Richard Collin, Jimmy Uddin, George Meligonis, Brian Leatherbarrow, Sajid Ataullah, Lucianne Irion, Chris J. Mclean, Shyamala C. Huilgol, Garry Davis, Timothy J. Sullivan

Abstract

The literature on Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the eyelid remains scarce, and there has yet to be a study using the most up-to-date TNM staging system for this rare but aggressive tumor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#2,981
of 6,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,145
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#28
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.