You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anhedonia and Reward-Circuit Connectivity Distinguish Nonresponders from Responders to Dorsomedial Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Psychiatry, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Downar, Joseph Geraci, Tim V. Salomons, Katharine Dunlop, Sarah Wheeler, Mary Pat McAndrews, Nathan Bakker, Daniel M. Blumberger, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Sidney H. Kennedy, Alastair J. Flint, Peter Giacobbe |
| Abstract |
Depression is a heterogeneous mental illness. Neurostimulation treatments, by targeting specific nodes within the brain's emotion-regulation network, may be useful both as therapies and as probes for identifying clinically relevant depression subtypes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 434 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 21% |
| Researcher | 81 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 79 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 96 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 21% |
| Psychology | 89 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,332,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#914
of 6,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,278
of 320,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#14
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.