↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and end-stage renal disease (ESRD): an open-label, single-arm, phase I study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and end-stage renal disease (ESRD): an open-label, single-arm, phase I study
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3287-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hang Quach, Darrell White, Andrew Spencer, P. Joy Ho, Divaya Bhutani, Mike White, Sandeep Inamdar, Chris Morris, Ying Ou, Martin Gyger

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of carfilzomib have been previously studied in multiple myeloma patients with varying degrees of renal impairment (normal, mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage renal disease [ESRD]) at doses of 15 and 20 mg/m(2). This study evaluated carfilzomib PK at higher doses of 27 and 56 mg/m(2) in normal renal function and ESRD patients. Patients received carfilzomib on two consecutive days/week for 3 weeks every 28-day cycle: 20 mg/m(2) (cycle 1 day 1-2), escalated to 27 mg/m(2) on cycle 1 day 8; if tolerated, 56 mg/m(2) starting cycle 2 day 1. The primary objective was PK assessment with safety/tolerability and response rate as secondary and exploratory objectives, respectively. 26 patients were enrolled (15 normal, 11 ESRD). There was a trend toward higher area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration in ESRD versus normal renal function patients; however, high interpatient PK variability was discerned. Relative to patients with normal renal function, ESRD patients showed 33% higher AUC. Overall response rate was 43% for the normal renal function and 60% for the ESRD groups. Safety findings were generally similar between the two groups and consistent with the known safety profile of carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients. There were no meaningful differences in PK between patients with normal renal function and ESRD in light of carfilzomib exposure-response relationships. These results continue to support dosing recommendation that no starting dose adjustment of carfilzomib appears warranted in patients with baseline renal impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,065,859
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#1,735
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,903
of 311,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.