↓ Skip to main content

A branch and bound algorithm for quantified quadratic programming

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Global Optimization, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A branch and bound algorithm for quantified quadratic programming
Published in
Journal of Global Optimization, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10898-016-0462-0
Authors

F. Domes, A. Goldsztejn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Professor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 44%
Chemical Engineering 2 22%
Computer Science 2 22%
Engineering 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,454,502
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Global Optimization
#136
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,345
of 333,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Optimization
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.