↓ Skip to main content

The consequences of malnutrition following discharge from rehabilitation to the community: a systematic review of current evidence in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The consequences of malnutrition following discharge from rehabilitation to the community: a systematic review of current evidence in older adults
Published in
Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/jhn.12167
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Marshall, J. Bauer, E. Isenring

Abstract

The prevalence of malnutrition in the rehabilitation setting is estimated to be 30-50%, with older adults at higher nutritional risk. Malnutrition also exists in the community setting, where 10-30% of adults are malnourished; however, the relationship between the two settings has been little explored. The present study aimed to determine the association between malnutrition in older adults admitted for rehabilitation and nutrition status, functional status, quality of life, institutionalisation, acute care admissions and mortality once discharged to the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 13 8%
Professor 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,121,176
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#432
of 1,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,187
of 320,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.