| Title |
The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10865-012-9416-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silke Burkert, Nina Knoll, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Oliver Gralla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,792,898
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#378
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,836
of 161,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.