You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular Evolution of Vertebrate Neurotrophins: Co-Option of the Highly Conserved Nerve Growth Factor Gene into the Advanced Snake Venom Arsenalf
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0081827 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kartik Sunagar, Bryan Grieg Fry, Timothy N. W. Jackson, Nicholas R. Casewell, Eivind A. B. Undheim, Nicolas Vidal, Syed A. Ali, Glenn F. King, Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Vitor Vasconcelos, Agostinho Antunes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sudan | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#160,972
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,390
of 326,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,360
of 5,158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.