↓ Skip to main content

Interpretation and Expectation in Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Age Effects and Social Specificity

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Interpretation and Expectation in Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Age Effects and Social Specificity
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10802-013-9795-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Creswell, Lynne Murray, Peter Cooper

Abstract

Theory and treatment for childhood anxiety disorders typically implicates children's negative cognitions, yet little is known about the characteristics of thinking styles of clinically anxious children. In particular, it is unclear whether differences in thinking styles between children with anxiety disorders and non-anxious children vary as a function of child age, whether particular cognitive distortions are associated with childhood anxiety disorders at different child ages, and whether cognitive content is disorder-specific. The current study addressed these questions among 120 7-12 year old children (53% female) who met diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder, other anxiety disorder, or who were not currently anxious. Contrary to expectations, threat interpretation was not inflated amongst anxious compared to non-anxious children at any age, although older (10-12 year old) anxious children did differ from non-anxious children on measures of perceived coping. The notion of cognitive-content specificity was not supported across the age-range. The findings challenge current treatment models of childhood anxiety, and suggest that a focus on changing anxious children's cognitions is not warranted in mid-childhood, and in late childhood cognitive approaches may be better focussed on promoting children's perceptions of control rather than challenging threat interpretations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 59%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,159
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,882
of 320,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.