You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael Patrick Geary, Mairead Mary Kennelly, Fionnuala Mary McAuliffe, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John Joseph Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth Catherine Tully, Fergal Desmond Malone |
| Abstract |
An objective of the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in IUGR (PORTO) study was to evaluate multivessel Doppler changes in a large cohort of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) fetuses to establish whether a predictable progressive sequence of Doppler deterioration exists and to correlate these Doppler findings with respective perinatal outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 29% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 68% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#10,930
of 13,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,101
of 211,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#42
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.