You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unsupported inferences of high‐severity fire in historical dry forests of the western United States: response to Williams and Baker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Ecology & Biogeography, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/geb.12136 |
| Authors |
Peter Z. Fulé, Thomas W. Swetnam, Peter M. Brown, Donald A. Falk, David L. Peterson, Craig D. Allen, Gregory H. Aplet, Mike A. Battaglia, Dan Binkley, Calvin Farris, Robert E. Keane, Ellis Q. Margolis, Henri Grissino‐Mayer, Carol Miller, Carolyn Hull Sieg, Carl Skinner, Scott L. Stephens, Alan Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Czechia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 57 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,090,694
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#497
of 1,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,792
of 318,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.