↓ Skip to main content

Stability and Trunnion Wear Potential in Large-diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hips: A Finite Element Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Stability and Trunnion Wear Potential in Large-diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hips: A Finite Element Analysis
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3244-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob M. Elkins, John J. Callaghan, Thomas D. Brown

Abstract

Large-diameter femoral heads for metal-on-metal THA hold theoretical advantages of joint stability and low bearing surface wear. However, recent reports have indicated an unacceptably high rate of wear-associated failure with large-diameter bearings, possibly due in part to increased wear at the trunnion interface. Thus, the deleterious consequences of using large heads may outweigh their theoretical advantages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,304
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,757
of 224,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#40
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.