↓ Skip to main content

Several allergens from Anisakis simplex are highly resistant to heat and pepsin treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Several allergens from Anisakis simplex are highly resistant to heat and pepsin treatments
Published in
Parasitology Research, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00436-004-1099-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Luisa Caballero, Ignacio Moneo

Abstract

Ingestion of raw or undercooked fish can lead to infection with Anisakis simplex. Sensitized patients show specific IgE to proteins from this parasite. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of specific IgE recognition directed to heat and/or pepsin-resistant allergens from A. simplex among sensitized patients. Twenty-seven patients with positive specific IgE and immunoblotting with a crude parasite extract were included in the study. Specific IgE detection against allergens resistant to boiling for 30 min and/or a pepsin digestion of an A. simplex extract was performed by immunoblotting. A total of 81% of the patients showed specific IgE to pepsin-resistant allergens and 67% had specific IgE to heat-resistant allergens. Thirty percent of patients recognized allergens after both treatments, one being the allergen detected by 75% of the patients of this group. Heat- and/or pepsin-resistant allergens from A. simplex could explain reactions and symptoms after the ingestion of well-cooked or canned fish.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,933,036
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#532
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,978
of 58,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.