↓ Skip to main content

Population sinks resulting from degraded habitats of an obligate life-history pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Population sinks resulting from degraded habitats of an obligate life-history pathway
Published in
Oecologia, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1834-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. H. Hickford, David R. Schiel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 42%
Environmental Science 22 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,411,853
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,762
of 4,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,661
of 106,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.