↓ Skip to main content

More functions of torpor and their roles in a changing world

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
More functions of torpor and their roles in a changing world
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00360-017-1100-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Nowack, Clare Stawski, Fritz Geiser

Abstract

Increased winter survival by reducing energy expenditure in adult animals is often viewed as the primary function of torpor. However, torpor has many other functions that ultimately increase the survival of heterothermic mammals and birds. In this review, we summarize new findings revealing that animals use torpor to cope with the conditions during and after natural disasters, including fires, storms, and heat waves. Furthermore, we suggest that torpor, which also prolongs longevity and was likely crucial for survival of mammals during the time of the dinosaur extinctions, will be advantageous in a changing world. Climate change is assumed to lead to an increase in the occurrence and intensity of climatic disasters, such as those listed above and also abnormal floods, droughts, and extreme temperatures. The opportunistic use of torpor, found in many heterothermic species, will likely enhance survival of these challenges, because these species can reduce energy and foraging requirements. However, many strictly seasonal hibernators will likely face the negative consequences of the predicted increase in temperature, such as range contraction. Overall, available data suggest that opportunistic heterotherms with their flexible energy requirements have an adaptive advantage over homeotherms in response to unpredictable conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 41%
Environmental Science 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Unspecified 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,342,039
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#58
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,982
of 323,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.