↓ Skip to main content

Social memory and resilience in New Orleans

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Social memory and resilience in New Orleans
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9267-x
Authors

Craig E. Colten, Amy R. Sumpter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 4 3%
France 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Virgin Islands, U.S. 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 133 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 30%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 28%
Environmental Science 33 22%
Engineering 15 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,704
of 82,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.