↓ Skip to main content

Transoral thyroidectomy: advantages and limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Transoral thyroidectomy: advantages and limitations
Published in
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40618-017-0676-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Dionigi, R. P. Tufano, J. Russell, H. Y. Kim, E. Piantanida, A. Anuwong

Abstract

In this opinion paper of the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, leading experts in the field report on their current clinical experience with a novel approach for thyroid gland surgery, namely, "transoral thyroidectomy" (TOT). This feasible and novel surgical procedure does not require visible incisions and is, therefore, a truly scarless surgery. Patients meeting the following criteria can be considered as candidates for TOT: (a) an ultrasonographically (US) estimated thyroid diameter ≤10 cm; (b) US-estimated gland volume ≤45 mL; (c) nodule size ≤50 mm; (d) presence of a benign tumor such as a thyroid cyst or a single- or multi-nodular goiter; (e) Bethesda 3 and/or 4 category and (f) papillary microcarcinoma without the evidence of metastasis. The procedure is conducted via a three-port technique at the oral vestibule using a 10-mm port for the 30° endoscope and two additional 5-mm ports for the dissecting and coagulating instruments. TOT is performed using conventional endoscopic instruments and is probably the best scarless approach to the thyroid because of the short distance between the thyroid and the incisions placed intra-orally that do not result in any cutaneous scar and upon following the surgical planes. Experts in TOT organized a working group of general, endocrine, head and neck ENT surgeons and endocrinologist to develop the standards for practicing this emerging technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#1,381
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,066
of 323,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.