↓ Skip to main content

The Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is a Prognostic Determinant of T3–4 Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is a Prognostic Determinant of T3–4 Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-5865-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wu-Chia Lo, Chen-Tu Wu, Cheng-Ping Wang, Tsung-Lin Yang, Pei-Jen Lou, Jeng-Yuh Ko, Yih-Leong Chang

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors that influence recurrence and survival in patients who undergo operations for T3-4 hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). One hundred and five patients who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2008 for advanced hypopharyngeal SCCs were consecutively enrolled and reviewed. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; median 3.22, range 0.62-46.50) was associated with disease recurrence and patient survival. A difference in the 5-year cumulative disease recurrence rate between patients with high (≥3.22) and low (<3.22) NLRs was significant (60.4 and 36.5%, respectively; p = 0.004). A multivariate analysis confirmed that an NLR ≥3.22 was an independent indicator of a poor prognosis for advanced hypopharyngeal SCC, as per the following parameters: overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.30, p = 0.001), disease-specific survival (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.38-4.34, p = 0.002), and disease-free survival (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.24-3.83, p = 0.007). Additional prognostic factors per the survival analyses included lymph node density, surgical margin, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. An NLR ≥3.22 is associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence and poor survival in patients with T3-4 hypopharyngeal SCCs. We propose the use of the NLR to broaden the current TNM staging system; the development of a more effective treatment protocol for patients with high NLRs will be essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,538
of 6,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,625
of 309,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#56
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.