You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continental‐Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Euan G. Ritchie, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Chris R. Dickman, Richard Hobbs, Christopher N. Johnson, Emma L. Johnston, William F. Laurance, David Lindenmayer, Michael A. McCarthy, Dale G. Nimmo, Hugh H. Possingham, Robert L. Pressey, David M. Watson, John Woinarski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 56 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#517,436
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#271
of 4,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,128
of 320,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#3
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.