↓ Skip to main content

The end of mass homeownership? Changes in labour markets and housing tenure opportunities across Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 288)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
The end of mass homeownership? Changes in labour markets and housing tenure opportunities across Europe
Published in
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10901-017-9551-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rowan Arundel, John Doling

Abstract

With continued economic growth and expanding mortgage markets, until recently the pattern across advanced economies was of growing homeownership sectors. The Great Financial Crisis (GFC) has however, undercut this growth resulting in the contraction of homeownership access in many countries and the revival of private renting. This paper argues that these tenure changes are not solely a consequence of the GFC, and therefore, reversible once long-term growth returns. Rather, they are the consequences of more fundamental changes especially in labour markets. The very financialisation that fuelled the growth of homeownership has also led to a hollowing out of well-paid, secure jobs-exactly those that fit best with the taking of housing loans. We examine longer-term declines in labour market security across Europe from before the GFC, identifying an underlying correlation between deteriorated labour market conditions and homeownership access for young adults. While variations exist across European countries, there is evidence of common trends. We argue that the GFC both accelerated pre-existing labour insecurity dynamics and brought an end to offsetting such dynamics through the expansion of credit access with the likelihood of a return to an era of widespread homeownership growth starkly decreased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Professor 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#959,535
of 25,018,122 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
#12
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,427
of 315,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,018,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.