↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA Detection and Target Identification

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'MicroRNA Detection and Target Identification'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Improved Denaturation of Small RNA Duplexes and Its Application for Northern Blotting
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 High-Throughput RT-qPCR for the Analysis of Circulating MicroRNAs
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genome-Wide Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and qPCR Platforms for microRNA Profiling in Serum
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Small RNA Profiling by Next-Generation Sequencing Using High-Definition Adapters
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Surface Acoustic Wave Lysis and Ion-Exchange Membrane Quantification of Exosomal MicroRNA
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Droplet Microfluidic Device Fabrication and Use for Isothermal Amplification and Detection of MicroRNA
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Interrogation of Functional miRNA–Target Interactions by CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Engineering
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Cell-Free Urinary MicroRNAs Expression in Small-Scale Experiments
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Peptide-Based Isolation of Argonaute Protein Complexes Using Ago-APP
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Predicting Functional MicroRNA-mRNA Interactions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Computational and Experimental Identification of Tissue-Specific MicroRNA Targets
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 sRNAtoolboxVM: Small RNA Analysis in a Virtual Machine
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 An Assessment of the Next Generation of Animal miRNA Target Prediction Algorithms
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The UEA Small RNA Workbench: A Suite of Computational Tools for Small RNA Analysis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Prediction of miRNA–mRNA Interactions Using miRGate
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Detection of microRNAs Using Chip-Based QuantStudio 3D Digital PCR
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 MiRNA Quantitation with Microelectrode Sensors Enabled by Enzymeless Electrochemical Signal Amplification
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Robust Protocol to Quantify Circulating Cancer Biomarker MicroRNAs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 MicroRNAs, Regulatory Networks, and Comorbidities: Decoding Complex Systems
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Label-Free Direct Detection of MiRNAs with Poly-Silicon Nanowire Biosensors
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Erratum to: Cell-Free Urinary MicroRNAs Expression in Small-Scale Experiments
Attention for Chapter 14: The UEA Small RNA Workbench: A Suite of Computational Tools for Small RNA Analysis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The UEA Small RNA Workbench: A Suite of Computational Tools for Small RNA Analysis
Chapter number 14
Book title
MicroRNA Detection and Target Identification
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6866-4_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6864-0, 978-1-4939-6866-4
Authors

Irina Mohorianu, Matthew Benedict Stocks, Christopher Steven Applegate, Leighton Folkes, Vincent Moulton, Mohorianu, Irina, Stocks, Matthew Benedict, Applegate, Christopher Steven, Folkes, Leighton, Moulton, Vincent

Editors

Tamas Dalmay

Abstract

RNA silencing (RNA interference, RNAi) is a complex, highly conserved mechanism mediated by short, typically 20-24 nt in length, noncoding RNAs known as small RNAs (sRNAs). They act as guides for the sequence-specific transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of target mRNAs and play a key role in the fine-tuning of biological processes such as growth, response to stresses, or defense mechanism.High-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies are employed to capture the expression levels of sRNA populations. The processing of the resulting big data sets facilitated the computational analysis of the sRNA patterns of variation within biological samples such as time point experiments, tissue series or various treatments. Rapid technological advances enable larger experiments, often with biological replicates leading to a vast amount of raw data. As a result, in this fast-evolving field, the existing methods for sequence characterization and prediction of interaction (regulatory) networks periodically require adapting or in extreme cases, a complete redesign to cope with the data deluge. In addition, the presence of numerous tools focused only on particular steps of HTS analysis hinders the systematic parsing of the results and their interpretation.The UEA small RNA Workbench (v1-4), described in this chapter, provides a user-friendly, modular, interactive analysis in the form of a suite of computational tools designed to process and mine sRNA datasets for interesting characteristics that can be linked back to the observed phenotypes. First, we show how to preprocess the raw sequencing output and prepare it for downstream analysis. Then we review some quality checks that can be used as a first indication of sources of variability between samples. Next we show how the Workbench can provide a comparison of the effects of different normalization approaches on the distributions of expression, enhanced methods for the identification of differentially expressed transcripts and a summary of their corresponding patterns. Finally we describe individual analysis tools such as PAREsnip, for the analysis of PARE (degradome) data or CoLIde for the identification of sRNA loci based on their expression patterns and the visualization of the results using the software. We illustrate the features of the UEA sRNA Workbench on Arabidopsis thaliana and Homo sapiens datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Computer Science 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,887,790
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,260
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,253
of 421,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#639
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.