↓ Skip to main content

Safety of EEG–fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Neurophysiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of EEG–fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom
Published in
Clinical Neurophysiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sampsa Vanhatalo, Aiman Alnajjar, Vinh T. Nguyen, Paul Colditz, Peter Fransson

Abstract

We aimed to study EEG electrode temperatures during MRI recordings using a neonatal-size phantom to establish the safety of neonatal EEG-MRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Austria 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Engineering 12 18%
Psychology 9 13%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurophysiology
#3,373
of 5,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,697
of 207,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurophysiology
#28
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.