↓ Skip to main content

Decoding neural responses to temporal cues for sound localization

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding neural responses to temporal cues for sound localization
Published in
eLife, December 2013
DOI 10.7554/elife.01312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan FM Goodman, Victor Benichoux, Romain Brette

Abstract

The activity of sensory neural populations carries information about the environment. This may be extracted from neural activity using different strategies. In the auditory brainstem, a recent theory proposes that sound location in the horizontal plane is decoded from the relative summed activity of two populations in each hemisphere, whereas earlier theories hypothesized that the location was decoded from the identity of the most active cells. We tested the performance of various decoders of neural responses in increasingly complex acoustical situations, including spectrum variations, noise, and sound diffraction. We demonstrate that there is insufficient information in the pooled activity of each hemisphere to estimate sound direction in a reliable way consistent with behavior, whereas robust estimates can be obtained from neural activity by taking into account the heterogeneous tuning of cells. These estimates can still be obtained when only contralateral neural responses are used, consistently with unilateral lesion studies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01312.001.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 21%
Engineering 7 9%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#603,660
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#2,079
of 13,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,826
of 306,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#10
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.