↓ Skip to main content

The origin and use of cannabis in eastern asia linguistic-cultural implications

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, July 1974
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The origin and use of cannabis in eastern asia linguistic-cultural implications
Published in
Economic Botany, July 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf02861426
Authors

Hui-Lin Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,597,150
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#280
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#853
of 3,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them