| Title |
Usability testing of ANSWER: a web-based methotrexate decision aid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda C Li, Paul M Adam, Anne F Townsend, Diane Lacaille, Charlene Yousefi, Dawn Stacey, Diane Gromala, Chris D Shaw, Peter Tugwell, Catherine L Backman |
| Abstract |
Decision aids are evidence-based tools designed to inform people of the potential benefit and harm of treatment options, clarify their preferences and provide a shared decision-making structure for discussion at a clinic visit. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are considering methotrexate, we have developed a web-based patient decision aid called the ANSWER (Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool). This study aimed to: 1) assess the usability of the ANSWER prototype; 2) identify strengths and limitations of the ANSWER from the patient's perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,622,162
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#423
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,047
of 307,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.