↓ Skip to main content

Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
403 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain
Published in
European Spine Journal, February 2000
DOI 10.1007/s005860050008
Pubmed ID
Authors

J-Y. Lazennec, S. Ramaré, N. Arafati, C. G. Laudet, M. Gorin, B. Roger, S. Hansen, G. Saillant, L. Maurs, R. Trabelsi

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct a radiological analysis of posture before and after lumbosacral fusion to evaluate the influence of spinal alignment on the occurrence and pattern of post surgical pain. The study included 81 patients, of whom 51 had a history of previous low back surgery. We excluded patients with suspected or confirmed nonunion. In the fusion group, the 27 patients who were pain free after the procedure were compared to the 54 patients with residual pain. Thirty patients had pain only or primarily when they were standing immobile, 18 when they were sitting immobile, and six in both positions. Measurements were done on full-length lateral radiographs of the spine, with the patient standing according to Duval Beaupère criteria. The subgroup with postfusion pain was characterized at baseline by a more vertical sacrum with less sacral tilt (ST) (P < 0.0062) and more pelvic tilt (PT) (P < 0.0160). PT at last follow-up (PT fu) correlated with the presence of postfusion pain (NP: P = 0.0003). In the patients with postfusion pain, PT was almost twice the normal value. ST at last follow-up (ST fu) in the standing position was also correlated with the presence of postfusion pain (P < 0.0001) indicating that the sacrum remained abnormally vertical in the subjects with postfusion pain. Using logistic regression, the only prognostic factor for residual pain at last follow-up was ST fu. Both at pre-operative evaluation and at last follow-up, patients with pain in the standing position or in both the standing and sitting positions were characterized at pre-operative status by a more vertical sacrum with less sacral tilt. The results of this study indicate that, achieving a strong fusion should not be the only goal. Appropriate position of the fused vertebrae is also of paramount importance to minimize muscle work during posture maintenance. The main risk is failing to correct or to causing excessive pelvic retroversion with a vertical sacrum leading to a sagittal alignment that replicates the sitting position. This situation is often accompanied by loss of lumbar lordosis and adversely affects stiff or degenerative hips.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Other 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 11%
Student > Master 16 9%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 51%
Engineering 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,217
of 5,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,889
of 111,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.