Title |
Developing a Pathway for High-value, Patient-centered Total Joint Arthroplasty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3398-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aricca D. Van Citters, Cheryl Fahlman, Donald A. Goldmann, Jay R. Lieberman, Karl M. Koenig, Anthony M. DiGioia, Beth O’Donnell, John Martin, Frank A. Federico, Richard A. Bankowitz, Eugene C. Nelson, Kevin J. Bozic |
Abstract |
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most widely performed elective procedures; however, there are wide variations in cost and quality among facilities where the procedure is performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 215 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
Researcher | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
Other | 44 | 20% |
Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 16% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 6% |
Engineering | 10 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 64 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,275,904
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,666
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,100
of 320,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#19
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.