↓ Skip to main content

Loneliness Among Older Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults: The Role of Minority Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Loneliness Among Older Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults: The Role of Minority Stress
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9513-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisette Kuyper, Tineke Fokkema

Abstract

Past research has consistently found that aging lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (LGBs) are more apt to suffer from loneliness than their heterosexual counterparts. Data from the 2002 Gay Autumn survey (N = 122) were used to find out whether minority stress relates to higher levels of loneliness among older LGB adults in the Netherlands. We examined five minority stress factors: external objective stressful events, expectations of those events, internalized homonegativity, hiding and concealment of one's LGB identity, and ameliorating processes. The results showed that greater insight into loneliness among older LGB adults was obtained when minority stress factors were considered. Older LGB adults who had experienced negative reactions, as well as aging LGBs who expected those reactions, had the highest levels of loneliness. Having an LGB social network buffered against the impact of minority stress. These minority stress processes added to the variance already explained by general factors that influenced levels of loneliness (partner relationships, general social network, physical health, and self-esteem). Interventions aimed at decreasing feelings of loneliness among older LGBs should be focused on decreasing societal homonegativity (to decrease the amount of negative and prejudiced reactions) and on the enhancement of social activities for LGB elderly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 35%
Social Sciences 50 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,128,291
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,813
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,182
of 110,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.