Title |
Resistance Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sports Medicine, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40279-013-0128-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zuyao Yang, Catherine A. Scott, Chen Mao, Jinling Tang, Andrew J. Farmer |
Abstract |
Resistance and aerobic exercises are both recommended as effective treatments for people with type 2 diabetes. However, the optimum type of exercise for the disease remains to be determined to inform clinical decision-making and facilitate personalized exercise prescription. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 19% |
United States | 9 | 12% |
Canada | 4 | 5% |
Spain | 4 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 4% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 45% |
Scientists | 22 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 806 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 792 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 142 | 18% |
Student > Master | 118 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 10% |
Researcher | 55 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 7% |
Other | 162 | 20% |
Unknown | 194 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 167 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 120 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 3% |
Other | 88 | 11% |
Unknown | 225 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#647,637
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#606
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,388
of 322,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.