↓ Skip to main content

Resistance Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
73 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
806 Mendeley
Title
Resistance Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0128-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zuyao Yang, Catherine A. Scott, Chen Mao, Jinling Tang, Andrew J. Farmer

Abstract

Resistance and aerobic exercises are both recommended as effective treatments for people with type 2 diabetes. However, the optimum type of exercise for the disease remains to be determined to inform clinical decision-making and facilitate personalized exercise prescription.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 806 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 792 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 142 18%
Student > Master 118 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 10%
Researcher 55 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 7%
Other 162 20%
Unknown 194 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 167 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 146 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 120 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 3%
Other 88 11%
Unknown 225 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#647,637
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#606
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,388
of 322,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.