↓ Skip to main content

La “Donna di Ostuni”, a case of eclampsia 28,000 years ago?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La “Donna di Ostuni”, a case of eclampsia 28,000 years ago?
Published in
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1080/14767058.2017.1312333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Yves Robillard, Marco Scioscia, Donato Coppola, Jean Chaline, Francesco Bonsante, Silvia Iacobelli

Abstract

La "Donna di Ostuni", the Lady from Ostuni (fortified medieval city, on the southern Italian Adriatic coast) is the skeleton of "the human most ancient mother" ever found by paleoanthropologists, grave dated of 28,000 years BP. It concerns a 20-years-old woman buried with her baby in her womb estimated at 8 months gestation. To date, the cause of the maternal-fetal deaths is qualified of unknown origin. We propose that eclampsia may be a possible explanation for these deaths (mother and baby together). Eclampsia (convulsions), the curse of human births (non-existent in other mammals), has been described since writings has existed 5000 years ago in all civilisations. This plausible description dating from Palaeolithic times, 28,000 years BP, long before the emergence of agriculture (10,000 years BP) may be an interesting milestone. Further, she was buried with a shell-made headdress, as represented in several "Venus" figurines retrieved in all the Eurasiatic area (notably the "Willemdorf Venus"). The authors propose a new hypothesis that this headdress could be a protective device for pregnant women not only for birthing, but also against the terrorising convulsions (eclampsia) which could happen in all human pregnancy, especially in the first ones (primiparae).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Arts and Humanities 4 19%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,112,949
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
#639
of 3,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,544
of 324,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
#19
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.