↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,328)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2491 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew L. Alexander, Jee Eun Lee, Mariana Lazar, Aaron S. Field

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising method for characterizing microstructural changes or differences with neuropathology and treatment. The diffusion tensor may be used to characterize the magnitude, the degree of anisotropy, and the orientation of directional diffusion. This review addresses the biological mechanisms, acquisition, and analysis of DTI measurements. The relationships between DTI measures and white matter pathologic features (e.g., ischemia, myelination, axonal damage, inflammation, and edema) are summarized. Applications of DTI to tissue characterization in neurotherapeutic applications are reviewed. The interpretations of common DTI measures (mean diffusivity, MD; fractional anisotropy, FA; radial diffusivity, D(r); and axial diffusivity, D(a)) are discussed. In particular, FA is highly sensitive to microstructural changes, but not very specific to the type of changes (e.g., radial or axial). To maximize the specificity and better characterize the tissue microstructure, future studies should use multiple diffusion tensor measures (e.g., MD and FA, or D(a) and D(r)).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Canada 11 <1%
Spain 9 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 27 1%
Unknown 2372 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 573 23%
Student > Master 386 15%
Researcher 347 14%
Student > Bachelor 294 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 166 7%
Other 330 13%
Unknown 395 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 491 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 452 18%
Psychology 272 11%
Engineering 212 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 7%
Other 338 14%
Unknown 551 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#138,409
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#17
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152
of 81,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.