↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of the Doppler ultrasound interpretation by student and registered podiatrists

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the Doppler ultrasound interpretation by student and registered podiatrists
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-6-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Young, Ivan Birch, Chloe Alexa Potter, Robert Saunders, Simon Otter, Shahin Hussain, Jane Pellett, Nadine Reynolds, Sarah Jenkin, Wendy Wright

Abstract

Hand held Doppler ultrasound machines are routinely used by podiatrists to assess the arterial perfusion of the lower limb. They are practical, painless and effective as a screening tool, and the available general evidence would suggest that interpretation by practitioners is reliable. This study compared the abilities of student and Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registered podiatrists to identify correctly Doppler ultrasound outputs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 38%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%