Title |
A comparison of the Doppler ultrasound interpretation by student and registered podiatrists
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-6-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Young, Ivan Birch, Chloe Alexa Potter, Robert Saunders, Simon Otter, Shahin Hussain, Jane Pellett, Nadine Reynolds, Sarah Jenkin, Wendy Wright |
Abstract |
Hand held Doppler ultrasound machines are routinely used by podiatrists to assess the arterial perfusion of the lower limb. They are practical, painless and effective as a screening tool, and the available general evidence would suggest that interpretation by practitioners is reliable. This study compared the abilities of student and Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registered podiatrists to identify correctly Doppler ultrasound outputs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 38% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |