| Title |
Developing an evidence‐based clinical pathway for the assessment, diagnosis and management of acute Charcot Neuro‐Arthropathy: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-6-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara E Milne, Joseph R Rogers, Ewan M Kinnear, Helen V Martin, Peter A Lazzarini, Thomas R Quinton, Frances M Boyle |
| Abstract |
Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy (CN) is one of the more devastating complications of diabetes. To the best of the authors' knowledge, it appears that no clinical tools based on a systematic review of existing literature have been developed to manage acute CN. Thus, the aim of this paper was to systematically review existing literature and develop an evidence-based clinical pathway for the assessment, diagnosis and management of acute CN in patients with diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |