↓ Skip to main content

Ataxin-3 Protein and RNA Toxicity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: Current Insights and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ataxin-3 Protein and RNA Toxicity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: Current Insights and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12035-013-8596-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melvin M. Evers, Lodewijk J. A. Toonen, Willeke M. C. van Roon-Mom

Abstract

Ataxin-3 is a ubiquitously expressed deubiqutinating enzyme with important functions in the proteasomal protein degradation pathway and regulation of transcription. The C-terminus of the ataxin-3 protein contains a polyglutamine (PolyQ) region that, when mutationally expanded to over 52 glutamines, causes the neurodegenerative disease spinocerebellar ataxia 3 (SCA3). In spite of extensive research, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular toxicity resulting from mutant ataxin-3 remain elusive and no preventive treatment is currently available. It has become clear over the last decade that the hallmark intracellular ataxin-3 aggregates are likely not the main toxic entity in SCA3. Instead, the soluble PolyQ containing fragments arising from proteolytic cleavage of ataxin-3 by caspases and calpains are now regarded to be of greater influence in pathogenesis. In addition, recent evidence suggests potential involvement of a RNA toxicity component in SCA3 and other PolyQ expansion disorders, increasing the pathogenic complexity. Herein, we review the functioning of ataxin-3 and the involvement of known protein and RNA toxicity mechanisms of mutant ataxin-3 that have been discovered, as well as future opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 24%
Neuroscience 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,640,348
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,911
of 3,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,617
of 306,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.