↓ Skip to main content

Are peculiar velocity surveys competitive as a cosmological probe?

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are peculiar velocity surveys competitive as a cosmological probe?
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, November 2014
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stu1610
Authors

Jun Koda, Chris Blake, Tamara Davis, Christina Magoulas, Christopher M. Springob, Morag Scrimgeour, Andrew Johnson, Gregory B. Poole, Lister Staveley-Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 33 85%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#32,511
of 39,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,412
of 276,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#483
of 702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.