Title |
Comparative floral spur anatomy and nectar secretion in four representatives of Ranunculaceae
|
---|---|
Published in |
Protoplasma, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00709-015-0794-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Antoń, Magdalena Kamińska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#134
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,006
of 261,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.