↓ Skip to main content

Composition of Antioxidants and Amino Acids in Stevia Leaf Infusions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Composition of Antioxidants and Amino Acids in Stevia Leaf Infusions
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11130-013-0398-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Periche, Georgios Koutsidis, Isabel Escriche

Abstract

Stevia, a non-caloric natural sweetener with beneficial properties and considerable antioxidants and amino acids, is increasingly consumed as an infusion. This work evaluates the influence of the conditions (temperature: 50, 70 or 90 °C and time: 1, 5, 20 or 40 min) applied to obtain Stevia infusions, on antioxidants (total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity) and amino acids. The total concentration of the eleven amino acids found was 11.70 mg/g in dried leaves and from 6.84 to 9.11 mg/g per gram of Stevia in infusions. However, infusions showed higher levels of certain amino acids (alanine, asparagine, leucine and proline), and greater values of the three antioxidant parameters in comparison with dry leaves. Temperature had more influence (minimum values at 50 °C and maximum at 90 °C) than time in the case of antioxidants. At 90 °C there were no important increases in the extraction of antioxidant compounds after 5 min; each gram of Stevia had 117 mg trolox (total antioxidant activity), 90 mg gallic acid (total phenols) and 56 mg catechin equivalents (flavonoids). Varying the temperature and time conditions no notable differences were observed in the concentrations of the majority of amino acids. However, the infusion treatment at 90 °C for 5 min was the best, as it gave the highest yield of 8 of the 11 amino acids. Therefore, with respect to the compounds analyzed in this study, the best way to obtain Stevia leaf infusions is the same as the domestic process, almost boiling water for a short time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 38%
Engineering 7 11%
Chemistry 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#536
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,135
of 307,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.