↓ Skip to main content

Stress in Multiple Sclerosis: Review of New Developments and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Stress in Multiple Sclerosis: Review of New Developments and Future Directions
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11910-013-0398-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesus Lovera, Tara Reza

Abstract

In the experimental autoimmune encephalitis model of multiple sclerosis, the effects of stress on disease severity depend on multiple factors, including the animal's genetics and the type of stressor. The studies in humans relating stress to the risk of developing multiple sclerosis have found discordant results. The studies looking at the association of stress with relapses show a fairly consistent association, where higher stress is associated with a higher risk of relapse. Higher stress levels also appear to increase the risk of development of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. A recent randomized trial shows that reducing stress using stress management therapy (SMT), a cognitive-behavioral therapy approach, results in a statistically significant reduction in new magnetic resonance imaging lesions. The magnitude of this effect is large and comparable to the effects of existent disease-modifying therapies, but no data exist yet proving that SMT reduces relapses or clinical progression; the effect of SMT appears to be short-lived. Additional work is needed to improve the duration of this effect and make this therapy more widely accessible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Psychology 14 16%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#18,354,567
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#762
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,739
of 211,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.