↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Intronless WNT10B-short variant underlies new recurrent allele-specific rearrangement in acute myeloid leukaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Intronless WNT10B-short variant underlies new recurrent allele-specific rearrangement in acute myeloid leukaemia
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep46788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Lazzaroni, Luca Del Giacco, Daniele Biasci, Mauro Turrini, Laura Prosperi, Roberto Brusamolino, Roberto Cairoli, Alessandro Beghini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#106,006
of 123,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,447
of 309,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,331
of 4,106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.