↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the relationship between perceived barriers to healthy eating and dietary behaviours in European adults

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exploring the relationship between perceived barriers to healthy eating and dietary behaviours in European adults
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00394-017-1458-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. G. M. Pinho, J. D. Mackenbach, H. Charreire, J.-M. Oppert, H. Bárdos, K. Glonti, H. Rutter, S. Compernolle, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, J. W. J. Beulens, J. Brug, J. Lakerveld

Abstract

Dietary behaviours may be influenced by perceptions of barriers to healthy eating. Using data from a large cross-European study (N = 5900), we explored associations between various perceived barriers to healthy eating and dietary behaviours among adults from urban regions in five European countries and examined whether associations differed across regions and socio-demographic backgrounds. Frequency of consumption of fruit, vegetables, fish, fast food, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets, breakfast and home-cooked meals were split by the median into higher and lower consumption. We tested associations between barriers (irregular working hours; giving up preferred foods; busy lifestyle; lack of willpower; price of healthy food; taste preferences of family and friends; lack of healthy options and unappealing foods) and dietary variables using multilevel logistic regression models. We explored whether associations differed by age, sex, education, urban region, weight status, household composition or employment. Respondents who perceived any barrier were less likely to report higher consumption of healthier foods and more likely to report higher consumption of fast food. 'Lack of willpower', 'time constraints' and 'taste preferences' were most consistently associated with consumption. For example, those perceiving lack of willpower ate less fruit [odds ratio (OR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.64], and those with a busy lifestyle ate less vegetables (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.47-0.62). Many associations differed in size, but not in direction, by region, sex, age and household composition. Perceived 'lack of willpower', 'time constraints' and 'taste preferences' were barriers most strongly related to dietary behaviours, but the association between various barriers and lower intake of fruit and vegetables was somewhat more pronounced among younger participants and women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Lecturer 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 78 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 88 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,604,713
of 24,086,622 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#421
of 2,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,612
of 313,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,086,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.