↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prospective open uncontrolled phase I study to define a well-tolerated dose of oral artesunate as add-on therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (ARTIC M33/2)
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4261-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The antimalarial drug artesunate (ART) is a promising candidate for cancer treatment as it displays anticancer effects in various models. While in short-term treatment of malaria, an excellent safety profile has been found for ART, the potential long-term treatment of cancer patients demands a phase I dose-finding clinical trial determining the daily ART dose which would be well tolerated as add-on therapy. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were to receive either 100 or 150 or 200 mg oral ART daily as add-on to their guideline-based oncological therapy for a study period of four weeks with frequent clinical and laboratory monitoring until 4-8 weeks thereafter. According to the statistical design, recruitment was scheduled in groups of three patients in order not to miss a more than 33% frequency of dose-limiting adverse events (DL-AE) prior to dose escalation. Twenty-three patients were recruited, and all planned dose levels were applied. During the actual trial period of 4 ± 1 weeks, three patients experienced six DL-AEs altogether (leucopenia, neutropenia, asthenia, anemia) possibly related to ART (not exceeding 33% in any dose level). Up to 200 mg/d (2.2-3.9 mg/kg/d) oral ART were safe and well tolerated; therefore, 200 mg/d are recommended for phase II/III trials. Safety monitoring should include reticulocytes, NTproBNP, as well as audiological and neurological exploration.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 39 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,887,790
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,595
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,498
of 309,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#64
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.