↓ Skip to main content

Can you see it too? Observed and self-rated participation in mainstream schools in students with and without autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can you see it too? Observed and self-rated participation in mainstream schools in students with and without autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Developmental Neurorehabilitation, December 2013
DOI 10.3109/17518423.2013.850751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marita Falkmer, Kirsty Oehlers, Mats Granlund, Torbjörn Falkmer

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To examine the degree to which observations can capture perception of participation, observed and self-rated levels of interactions for students with and without autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were explored. Methods: Frequencies and levels of involvement in interactions with classmates were observed and compared in 22 students with ASD and 84 of their classmates in mainstream schools, using a standardized protocol. Self-reported participation measurements regarding interactions with classmates and teachers from five questionnaire items were correlated with the observations. In total, 51 516 data points were coded and entered into the analyses, and correlated with 530 questionnaire ratings. Results: Only one weak correlation was found in each group. Compared with classmates, students with ASD participated less frequently, but were not less involved when they actually did. Conclusions: Observations alone do not capture the individuals' perception of participation and are not sufficient if the subjective aspect of participation is to be measured.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Neurorehabilitation
#426
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,145
of 320,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Neurorehabilitation
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.