↓ Skip to main content

The use (and misuse) of archaeological salmon data to infer historical abundance in North America with a focus on New England

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The use (and misuse) of archaeological salmon data to infer historical abundance in North America with a focus on New England
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9337-3
Authors

Stephen F. Jane, Keith H. Nislow, Andrew R. Whiteley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,931,804
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#329
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,269
of 316,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.