↓ Skip to main content

Research in cardiovascular care: A position statement of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals of the European Society of Cardiology

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research in cardiovascular care: A position statement of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals of the European Society of Cardiology
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, October 2013
DOI 10.1177/1474515113509761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiny Jaarsma, Christi Deaton, Donna Fitzsimmons, Bengt Fridlund, Bjarne M Hardig, Romy Mahrer-Imhof, Philip Moons, Samar Noureddine, Sharon O’Donnell, Susanne S Pedersen, Simon Stewart, Anna Strömberg, David R Thompson, Yasemin Tokem, Barbro Kjellström

Abstract

To deliver optimal patient care, evidence-based care is advocated and research is needed to support health care staff of all disciplines in deciding which options to use in their daily practice. Due to the increasing complexity of cardiac care across the life span of patients combined with the increasing opportunities and challenges in multidisciplinary research, the Science Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals (CCNAP) recognised the need for a position statement to guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies to contribute to the advancement of the body of knowledge that is needed to further improve cardiovascular care. In this paper, knowledge gaps in current research related to cardiovascular patient care are identified, upcoming challenges are explored and recommendations for future research are given.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,801,458
of 24,466,750 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#414
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,256
of 217,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,466,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.