| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Different anesthesia methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Anaesthesiologie, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00101-011-1863-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
X. Liu, C. Wei, Z. Wang, H. Wang |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to compare the possibility of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using two different anesthesia procedures (spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 28% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#29
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,812
of 119,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them