↓ Skip to main content

Animal path integration: A model of positional uncertainty along tortuous paths

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Animal path integration: A model of positional uncertainty along tortuous paths
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen Cheung

Abstract

Exact closed form mathematical solutions are reported which quantify the dynamic uncertainty resulting from path integration (PI) along tortuous paths. Based on a correlated random walk model, the derived results quantify positional estimation error moments with and without a compass, in discrete and continuous time. Consistent with earlier studies on attempted straight-line navigation, using a compass significantly reduces the uncertainty during PI, making purely idiothetic PI biologically implausible except over short distances. Examples are used to illustrate the contributions of angular noise, linear noise and path tortuosity, under different conditions. Linear noise is shown to be relatively more important with a compass while angular noise is more important without. It is shown that increasing path tortuosity decreases positional uncertainty, true for long and short journeys, irrespective of whether a compass is used, or the level of noise. In contrast, reducing angular noise also reduces uncertainty, but only below some critical level of noise. Using canonical equations of PI, it is shown that polar PI using a compass accumulates uncertainty in a manner similar to Cartesian PI without a compass. Issues of data sampling bias and intermittent use of a compass are also considered for PI along tortuous paths.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 30%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 39%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Physics and Astronomy 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 13%