↓ Skip to main content

Sulforaphane promotes ER stress, autophagy, and cell death: implications for cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Sulforaphane promotes ER stress, autophagy, and cell death: implications for cataract surgery
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00109-016-1502-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanruo Liu, Andrew JO Smith, Simon SR Ball, Yongping Bao, Richard P Bowater, Ningli Wang, I. Michael Wormstone

Abstract

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) commonly develops following cataract surgery and is a wound-healing response that can ultimately lead to secondary visual loss. Improved management of this problem is required. The isothiocyanate, sulforaphane (SFN), is reported to exert cytoprotective and cytotoxic actions, and the latter may be exploited to treat/prevent PCO. SFN concentrations of 10 μM and above significantly impaired wound-healing in a human lens capsular bag model. A similar pattern of response was also seen with a human lens cell line, FHL124. SFN treatment promoted increased expression of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress genes, which also corresponded with protein expression. Evidence of autophagy was observed in response to SFN as determined by increased microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3)-II levels and detection of autophagic vesicles. This response was disrupted by established autophagy inhibitors chloroquine and 3-MA. SFN was found to promote MAPK signaling, and inhibition of ERK activation using U0126 prevented SFN-induced LC3-II elevation and vesicle formation. SFN also significantly increased levels of reactive oxygen species. Taken together, our findings suggest that SFN is capable of reducing lens cell growth and viability and thus could serve as a putative therapeutic agent for PCO. SFN reduces lens epithelial cell growth, migration, and viability. SFN can promote ER stress and autophagy in lens cells. SFN promotes MAPK signaling, and inhibition of MEK can suppress SFN-induced autophagy. ER stress and autophagy in lens cells are likely promoted by ROS production. SFN may help prevent posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,856,443
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#1,057
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,527
of 422,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.