↓ Skip to main content

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
72 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
Title
Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4633-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brennan C. Kahan, Desponia Koulenti, Kostoula Arvaniti, Vanessa Beavis, Douglas Campbell, Matthew Chan, Rui Moreno, Rupert M. Pearse, The International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS) group

Abstract

As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10-5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 380 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 63 17%
Researcher 43 11%
Professor 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Other 89 23%
Unknown 102 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 54%
Engineering 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Unspecified 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 123 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#816,916
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#766
of 5,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,737
of 323,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.