Title |
The contours of control
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophical Studies, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11098-013-0236-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua Shepherd |
Abstract |
Necessarily, if S lacks the ability to exercise (some degree of) control, S is not an agent. If S is not an agent, S cannot act intentionally, responsibly, or rationally, nor can S possess or exercise free will. In spite of the obvious importance of control, however, no general account of control exists. In this paper I reflect on the nature of control itself. I develop accounts of control's exercise and control's possession that illuminate what it is for degrees of control-that is, the degree of control an agent possesses or exercises in a given circumstance-to vary. Finally, I demonstrate the usefulness of the account on offer by showing how it generates a solution to a long-standing problem for causalist theories of action, namely, the problem of deviant causation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 29% |
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 18 | 64% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |